The demands of the industrial environment are ongoing, with ever-changing trends. Cables, which were once able to sustain functional and operational integrity a decade ago, would not be adequate to survive in the environment of a present-day manufacturing site. Everywhere, from the Renewable Energy Industry, Automotive Assembly Plants, to the factories that manufacture small office machines and even in some commercial buildings, the oil resistance of cables has become increasingly important.
Oils serve a dual-purpose role in industrial applications, both as a coolant and lubricant, depending upon the requirements mandated by the end-use application.
Sustaining trouble-free cable operation under harsh chemical and environmental conditions reduces costly manufacturing downtime and helps to eliminate or minimize periodic maintenance and costly cable replacement.
All of these factors mentioned play a major role that is critical to a consistent, smoothly run manufacturing operation, which in the end, results in higher profit margins.
Regulatory and Code Changes
With the changes to the National Electrical Code (NEC) in the past 20 years, a protective conduit or raceway is no longer required when running an exposed run (-ER) cable from the tray to the equipment or device. Previously, when the cable was extended from tray to machine, a conduit or raceway was used primarily as a protection mechanism in helping to prevent cable damage.
Originally TC-ER cable (previously printed “open wiring”) had a length limitation of 50 ft. from the tray to the equipment. The 50 ft. allowances resolved a large “grey” area in the industrial environment and were initially a well-received solution by the industry. Due to the overwhelming acceptance of the 50 ft. length allowance, the NEC committee enacted further changes shortly thereafter, permitting unlimited length of TC-ER under Article 336.
With the advent of unlimited length, Article 336 also brought other issues, like a greater area of cable exposure and susceptibility to the surrounding industrial environment. Under the typical conditions of operation, consideration for factors such as ambient temperature, a cable's mechanical strength, unintended movement and constant exposure to industrial lubricating and coolant oils must be taken into account.
When exposed to these conditions, the cable inevitably will begin to deteriorate; the overall jacket may swell and/or crack, creating a potentially hazardous condition, along with machine and production downtime. These possible problems are undesirable and necessitate the need to implement cable protection measures. When referring to NFPA 79, the electrical standard for industrial machinery, Machine Tool Wire (MTW) is one type of cable permitted.
Under the standard for machine tool wire, UL 1063, passing the Oil Res I test is required and further severe testing such as the Oil Res II is optional. Environmental resistance tests, such as those per UL Standards were implemented in response to the globalization of industry with the goal of standardizing the oil resistance requirements of cables used in manufacturing industrial machinery throughout the world.
All wire and cable insulation are not created equal. Electrical, environmental, mechanical, and chemical attributes will vary depending upon the individual compound formulations. Insulating compounds contain a specific amount of plasticizers in their individual formulations, which help promote flexibility and resistance to fatigue.
When compounds are exposed to lubricating and coolant processing oils the material either absorbs the oil or the plasticizer will diffuse from the compound.
When oil is absorbed, it causes severe swelling and softening of the compound resulting in degradation of tensile properties. When the oil causes diffusion of the compound plasticizer, hardening will result and all flexibility and elongation properties are lost. The following images illustrate the effects that oil can inflict on cable jackets and insulation:
These pictures verify the damage caused by oil exposure is irreversible and creates hazardous conditions. Now, in addition to cable replacement costs, there is also the expense of reinstallation to be taken into account.
To avoid these types of unwanted scenarios, the customer must review the properties of the cables they are about to consider for their application and determine suitability for the oil environment.
There are UL tests, which help determine how a cable will react in the industrial oil environment. These tests are more commonly referred to as the Oil Res I and Oil Res II tests, which involve continuous immersion of the cable samples in IRM 902 at elevated temperatures for a specified period of time.
Passing results are determined by the evaluation of mechanical properties and observations of physical damage caused by oil exposure. In 2000, LAPP as an innovator and leader approached UL about creating tougher standards which resulted in the creation of AWM style 21098.
The table below indicates the industry standard tests that are used to evaluate wire and cable oil exposure performance.
Industry Oil Exposure Tests
|UL 62||Oil Immersion for 7 Days @ 60°C||75% retention of unaged tensile and elongation|
|UL Oil Res I||Oil Immersion for 4 Days @ 100°C||50% retention of unaged tensile and elongation|
|UL Oil Res II||Oil Immersion for 60 Days @ 75°C||65% retention of unaged tensile and elongation|
|UL AWM 21098||Oil Immersion for 60 Days @ 80°C||65% retention of unaged tensile and elongation|
Example of Tensile and Elongation Test Methods
Let us assume, for example, that the cable jacket of your product is going to be tested for compliance to UL Oil Res II. Tensile and Elongation tests must be performed both on the original (unaged) and oil immersed (aged) test samples and must be prepared as defined under UL Standard 2556. Die cut dumbbell specimens are taken from the jacket and are then tested for tensile strength and elongation.
As for sample preparation, two marks are applied approximately 1.3 inches apart from each other and equidistant from the center of the dumbbell sample. These marks are applied at right angles to the direction of the pull in the testing apparatus.
The sample is then clamped on the tester with one-inch marks outside of and between the grips. The grips are then separated at the rate of 20 inches per minute until the sample breaks.
Results are then recorded for elongation and pound-force breakage; tensile strength is calculated by dividing the pound-force by the cross-sectional area of the specimen.
Untested die cut samples are aged under the UL Oil Res II requirement of 75°C for 60 days. After 60 days, the samples are removed from the oil for a minimum of 16 hours. They are then tested for tensile and elongation, which must retain 65% of the unaged values.
The following is an example for an Oil Res II test results:
|Sample||Tensile Strength (PSI)||Elongation (%)||Tensile Retention(%)|
|Elongation Retention (%)|
|Aged||3625||129||98 / Pass||77 / Pass|
Oil Res II Test Requirement:
65% of the original tensile and elongation values
65% (3698 Psi) = 2404 Psi, min. 65% (167%) = 109%, min.